<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Denver Colorado Childbirth and Baby Classes - BirthPro &#187; Cesarean Section</title>
	<atom:link href="http://birthproonline.com/category/cesarean-section/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://birthproonline.com</link>
	<description>Comprehensive Birth and Family Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:50:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Trouble With Repeat Cesareans &#8211; TIME Magazine Article</title>
		<link>http://birthproonline.com/2009/03/13/the-trouble-with-repeat-cesareans-time-magazine-article/</link>
		<comments>http://birthproonline.com/2009/03/13/the-trouble-with-repeat-cesareans-time-magazine-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cesarean Section]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birthproonline.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time Magazine recently published an article about the risks associated with repeat C-sections and the difficulty it is to have a VBAC in the U.S.  Hopefully the media will continue to shed light on the frightening C-secion stastistics causing a change in this ever-growing trend in America.
TIME Magazine &#8211; The Trouble With Repeat Cesareans
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time Magazine recently published an article about the risks associated with repeat C-sections and the difficulty it is to have a VBAC in the U.S.  Hopefully the media will continue to shed light on the frightening C-secion stastistics causing a change in this ever-growing trend in America.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1880665-1,00.html">TIME Magazine &#8211; The Trouble With Repeat Cesareans</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://birthproonline.com/2009/03/13/the-trouble-with-repeat-cesareans-time-magazine-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Study on Non-Emergency Cesarean Birth</title>
		<link>http://birthproonline.com/2007/11/29/new-study-on-non-emergency-cesarean-birth/</link>
		<comments>http://birthproonline.com/2007/11/29/new-study-on-non-emergency-cesarean-birth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cesarean Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birthproonline.com/2007/11/29/new-study-on-non-emergency-cesarean-birth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study published in the British Medical Journal finds that women who gave birth by a non-emergency cesarean were twice as likely to face maternal morbidity as those who delivered vaginally. Women who received non-emergency cesareans were also three to five times more likely to undergo a hysterectomy and develop a postpartum infection, compared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new study published in the British Medical Journal finds that women who gave birth by a non-emergency cesarean were twice as likely to face maternal morbidity as those who delivered vaginally. Women who received non-emergency cesareans were also three to five times more likely to undergo a hysterectomy and develop a postpartum infection, compared to women who gave birth vaginally. And babies delivered by non-emergency c-section were twice as likely to remain in neonatal intensive care (NICU) for at least seven days.</p>
<p>The one protective effect of cesareans they did find: Breech babies delivered by c-section had lower risk of fetal death and their mothers had reduced vaginal complications. In evaluating the data from over 97,000 births, the research team recommends cesarean section for high-risk deliveries only. For the abstract, go to:<br />
<a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/bmj.39363.706956.55v1?maxtoshow=&amp;HITS=10&amp;hits=10&amp;RESULTFORMAT=&amp;fulltext=maternal+neonatal+caesarean&amp;sea"> British Medical Journal</a></p>
<p>Additional Source:  <a href="http://www.hmhb.org">www.hmhb.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://birthproonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/photo-courtesy-of-creative-touch-photography4.jpg" title="photo-courtesy-of-creative-touch-photography4.jpg"><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://birthproonline.com/2007/11/29/new-study-on-non-emergency-cesarean-birth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
